Comparison and Design of Multi-Storied Buildings in All Four Zones, By Using STAAD Pro

Authors

  • Pushkar Lal Sahu Bharti Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India Author
  • Bhojram Sahu Bharti Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India Author

Keywords:

staad pro, time history analysis

Abstract

In civil engineering structure seismic design of multi-storey building requires both static and dynamic analysis are perform. Static analysis is performed for regular buildings upto 90m height in zone II & III. Dynamic analysis is performed for both regular and irregular buildings in zone IV & V. Dynamic analysis is eighter performed by the “Time History Method” or “Response Spectrum Method”. The weakness arises due to discontinuity in mass, stiffness and geometry of structure. Mass irregularity shall be considered to exist where the weight of any storey is more than 200% of that of its adjacent storeys. There is necessary to construct a structure which is earthquake resistance at a particular level of intensity of shaking a structure. The project consists of G+10 buildings with same plan. Irregular building (T-shape) is compared in all four zones. All these buildings are designed with same height and plan with their respective ideas. The designing has been carried out in STAAD.Pro software (software that deals with analysing and designing of structures. The modelling and graphics of this software is more clear and perfect and easy to understand). All the G+10 building structure and modelled, analysed and then designed for all four zones. Results are compared with respect to all zones. The base shear force, volume of concrete, weight of steel and cost effectiveness have been calculated to depict all the differences in structure behaviour when analysed in all four zones in STAAD.Pro software.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sabari, S., & Praveen, J. V. (2014). Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with Floating Column.

Sreekanth Gandla Nanabala, Pradeep Kumar Ramancharla, & Arunakanthi, E. (2014). Seismic Analysis of a Normal Building and Floating Column Building.

Srikanth, M. K., & Yogeendra, R. H. (2014). Seismic Response of Complex Buildings with Floating Column for Zone II and Zone V.

Mundada, A. P., & Sawdatkar, G. (2014). Comparative Seismic Analysis of MultiStorey Building with and without Floating Column.

Nautiyal, P., Akhtar, S., & Batham, G. (2014). Seismic Response Evaluation of RC Frame Building with Floating Column Considering Different Soil Conditions.

Balwaik, A. S. (2014). Comparative Analysis of G+1 Structure with and without Floating Column.

Kavya, N., Manjunatha, K., & Dyavappanavar, S. P. (2014). Seismic Evaluation of Multi-storey RC Building with and without Floating Column. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET).

Roy, S. (2014). Comparative Studies of Floating Column of Different Multistoried Building.

Rohilla, I., Gupta, S. M., & Saini, B. (2014). Seismic Response of Multi-storey Irregular Building with Floating Column.

Behera, S. (2014). Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with Floating Column.

Prasad, P. V., & Sekhar, T. R. (2014). Study of Behaviour of Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied Building with and without Floating Column. Carib.J.SciTech.

Bhensdadia, H., & Shah, S. (2014). Pushover Analysis of RC Frame Structure with Floating Column and Soft Storey in Different Earthquake Zones.

Malaviya, P., & Saurav (2014). Comparative Study of Effect of Floating Columns on the Cost Analysis of a Structure Designed on STAAD Pro V8i.

Badgire, U. S., Shaikh, A. N., & Maske, R. G. (2014). Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with Floating Column. International Journal of Engineering Research.

Bandwal, N., Pande, A., Mendhe, V., & Yadav, A. (2014). To Study Seismic Behaviour of RC Building with Floating Columns.

Downloads

Published

23-04-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles