Comparative Analysis of a G+4 structure Considering Slab Stiffness on Structural Behaviour of L Shaped Building Plan

Authors

  • Harsha Barle P.G. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, R.S.R. Rungta, Bhilai, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • K. Divya Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, R.S.R. Rungta, Bhilai, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Lokesh Singh Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, R.S.R. Rungta, Bhilai, Madhya Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCE

Keywords:

L Shaped Building, Slab Stiffness, Lateral Resistance, STAAD.Pro

Abstract

Slab is considered as a very important structural elements. The slabs are generally functioned to minimize the weight coming normal to its plane. In general practise, the weight/load exerted on a beam by a slab is considered in the analysis without considering slab stiffness. In our study we will consider a G+4 L shape structure considering case with and without consideration of slab stiffness using analysis tool STAAD.Pro This software is capable to apply gravity and seismic loads. Shear force, storey displacements, axial force, bending moment and support reactions are considered to prepare comparative study to present the effect of slab stiffness. The results shows that there is a good reduction in forces, bending moment which will reduce reinforcement requirement and displacement of the storey due to consideration of slab stiffness. Also visible reduction is seen in case of forces and bending moment at supports. The slab stiffness results in reduction in reinforcement requirement and providing proper stability to the building frame. In present work approximately 20% lesser reinforcement is required when stiffness of slab is taken into account in the analysis resulting in an economical design.              

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Large, G.E. (1950), “Basic Reinforced Concrete Design”, The Ronald Press Company.

Danay A. (1976), “A general element for analysis of asymmetric multi-storey buildings with varying cross-section, Building and Environment”, 11 (1), pp. 57–67.

Nakashima M., Huang T., and Lu L.W. (1983), “Effect of diaphragm flexibility on seismic response of building structures”, Proceedings of The Eight World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 735-742.

Jain S. K., and Jennings P. (1985), “Analytical models for low-rise buildings with flexible floor diaphragms”, Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 13(2), pp. 225-241.

Jin C.S., Ti H., Wu L.L. (1988), “Diaphragm behavior of reinforced concrete floor slabs”, Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Japan.

Kunnath S., Panahshahi N., and Reinhorn A. (1991), “Seismic response of RC buildings with inelastic floor diaphragms”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 117(4), pp. 1218–1237.

Hawary M. M. (1994), “Effect of horizontal diaphragm flexibility on the P-delta analysis”, Published by Elsevier Ltd, 53(6), pp. 1275–1280.

Dolce M., Lorusso V. D., Masi A. (1994), “Seismic response of building structures with flexible inelastic diaphragms”, Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 3(2), pp. 87-106.

Chopra, A. K. (1995), “Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering”, Prentice-Hall.Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Lee D.G., Kim H.S., Chun M.H. (2002),” Efficient seismic analysis of high-rise building structures with the effects of floor slabs”, Engineering Structures, 24(5), pp. 613-623.

IS 1893 : 2002, “Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures”, Part 1 General provisions and buildings, Draft of Fifth Revision, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Bull D.K. (2003), “Understanding the Complexities of Designing Diaphragms in Buildings for Earthquakes”, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for the Earthquake Engineering 37(4).

Joel B.M. and Mary H.B.D. (2004), “Diaphragm Effects in Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, ACI Structural Journal, pp. 615-624.

Lee H.J., Aschheim M.A., Kuchma D. (2007),” Interstory drift estimates for low-rise flexible diaphragm structures”, Engineering Structures, 29(7), pp. 1375-1397.

Gardiner D. R., Bull D.K., Carr A. J. (2008), “Internal forces of concrete floor diaphragms in multi-storey buildings”, New Zealand Society Earthquake Engineering Conference, Paper No. 21.

Fouad K., Ali Z., Mustapha R. (2012), “Structural analyses with flexibility effect of the floor slabs”, Proceedings of the Fifteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1223-1230.

Duggal S.K. (2015), “Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, Oxford Publications.

Yadav P. and Khuswaha S.S. (2016), “Influence of floor diaphragm building while considering seismic forces”, International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Research Technology, 5(6), pp. 178-191.

Downloads

Published

10-10-2020

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Barle, H., Divya, K., & Singh, L. (2020). Comparative Analysis of a G+4 structure Considering Slab Stiffness on Structural Behaviour of L Shaped Building Plan . International Journal of Scientific Research in Civil Engineering, 4(5), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCE

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 338

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.