Sensitivity Analysis of Hydraulic Roughness and Boundary Conditions in 2D HEC-RAS Models for Urbanizing Basins

Authors

  • Itohaosa Isibor Department of Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville Texas, USA Author
  • Otugene Victor Bamigwojo Department of Mathematics, Federal University, Lokoja, Nigeria Author
  • Lawrence Anebi Enyejo Telecommunications and Ancillary Unit NBC HQ Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria Author
  • Gamaliel Ibuola Olola Canadore College, Canada Duke Street, North Bay, ON, Canada Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCE26103

Keywords:

HEC-RAS 2D, hydraulic roughness, sensitivity analysis, urban flooding, boundary conditions, shallow water equations, flood risk modeling

Abstract

Rapid urbanization alters watershed hydrodynamics by increasing impervious surface coverage, reducing infiltration capacity, and modifying natural flow pathways, thereby intensifying flood risks in developing urban basins. Two-dimensional (2D) hydraulic models, particularly HEC-RAS 2D, provide advanced capabilities for simulating spatially distributed flood processes; however, model outputs remain highly sensitive to hydraulic parameterization and boundary condition assumptions. This study presents a structured sensitivity analysis of hydraulic roughness and boundary conditions in a 2D HEC-RAS framework applied to an urbanizing watershed. Spatially distributed Manning’s roughness coefficients were assigned based on land-use classification, while multiple upstream discharge and downstream normal-depth scenarios were evaluated through a scenario matrix. Sensitivity was quantified using local and normalized sensitivity indices to assess parameter influence on maximum water depth, velocity magnitude, and flood extent area. Results indicate that hydraulic roughness is the dominant control on inundation depth and spatial flooding patterns, whereas upstream discharge primarily governs velocity response and downstream boundary conditions regulate backwater effects. Interaction analysis reveals nonlinear coupling between resistance and boundary forcing, demonstrating that parameter effects are not independent. The findings highlight key sources of uncertainty in urban flood modeling and provide engineering guidance for calibration prioritization and improved flood risk assessment. Recommendations include incorporation of time-varying roughness, coupling with rainfall–runoff models, and integration with real-time forecasting systems to enhance predictive reliability in rapidly urbanizing environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adewale, L. D. (2025a). Applying Supply Chain 4.0 to vertical supply chain integration: A key to revitalizing US automotive manufacturing sector. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0225.0940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0225.0940

Adewale, L. D. (2025b). Lifecycle assessment and circular economy strategies for sustainable automotive materials: Optimizing recycling, waste reduction, and cost efficiency. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0225.0953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0225.0953

Adewale, L. D. (2025c). Sustainable and high-performance materials in automotive manufacturing: Enhancing durability, lightweighting, and lifecycle optimization through data-driven material science. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS67497

Adewale, L. D. (2026). Machine learning surrogate models replacing physics simulations. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 12(12), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.7753/IJCATR1212.1030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7753/IJCATR1212.1030

Arcement, G. J., & Schneider, V. R. (1989). Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339

Arnold, C. L., & Gibbons, C. J. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975688

Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Fewtrell, T. J. (2010). A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 387(1–2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027

Brunner, G. W. (2016). HEC-RAS river analysis system hydraulic reference manual (Version 5.0). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center.

Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill.

Costabile, P., Costanzo, C., Ferraro, D., & Macchione, F. (2020). Performances of the new HEC-RAS version 5 for 2-D hydrodynamic-based rainfall–runoff simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 585, 124762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092326

Cunge, J. A., Holly, F. M., & Verwey, A. (1980). Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman Publishing.

Fletcher, T. D., Andrieu, H., & Hamel, P. (2013). Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001

Helton, J. C., Johnson, J. D., Sallaberry, C. J., & Storlie, C. B. (2006). Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(10–11), 1175–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.017

Horritt, M. S., & Bates, P. D. (2002). Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology, 268(1–4), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X

Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Wilson, M. D. (2007). Simple spatially distributed models for predicting flood inundation. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021

Leandro, J., Chen, A. S., Djordjević, S., & Savić, D. A. (2009). Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D coupled flood inundation models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(6), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000037

Neal, J., Schumann, G., & Bates, P. (2012). A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas. Water Resources Research, 48(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514

Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040

Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J. W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D. B., & Wagener, T. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow. Environmental Modelling & Software, 79, 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008

Sanders, B. F. (2007). Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Advances in Water Resources, 30(8), 1831–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.02.005

Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis: The primer. Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470725184

Shuster, W. D., Bonta, J., Thurston, H., Warnemuende, E., & Smith, D. (2005). Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology. Urban Water Journal, 2(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620500386529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620500386529

Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017). Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 90, 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006

Toro, E. F. (2001). Shock-capturing methods for free-surface shallow flows. Wiley.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center. (2016). HEC-RAS 2D modeling user’s manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P. (2005). The urban stream syndrome. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24(3), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1899/04-028.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1899/04-028.1

Downloads

Published

20-02-2026

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): January-February

Section

Research Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

How to Cite

[1]
Itohaosa Isibor, Otugene Victor Bamigwojo, Lawrence Anebi Enyejo, and Gamaliel Ibuola Olola, “Sensitivity Analysis of Hydraulic Roughness and Boundary Conditions in 2D HEC-RAS Models for Urbanizing Basins”, Int J Sci Res Civil Engg, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–46, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.32628/IJSRCE26103.