Analysis of Different Span Cantilever Bridge As Per IRC Loading Using Staad Beava : A Review

Authors(2) :-Manish Sahu, Murlidhar Chouraiya

Long-range bridges are built by offset cantilever technique with segmental development. For cement and steel the time-subordinate factors, for example, creep, shrinkage and unwinding and so forth are the components which cause high variety in load for the duration of the life of long-length spans and such circumstance, seismic evaluation gets basic and goal. Prior exploration has underscored the significance of time-subordinate elements like downer, shrinkage and unwinding and so on in the investigation of an adjusted cantilever bridge, the current codes and experts in this field recommends the singular amount arrangements, prompting lacking assessment of remaining quality/administration stress which may prompt basic condition.

Authors and Affiliations

Manish Sahu
P.G. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Infinity Management and Engineering College, Sagar Madhya Pradesh, India
Murlidhar Chouraiya
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Infinity Management and Engineering College, Sagar Madhya Pradesh, India

Cantilever Bridge, STAAD.Beava, Bending Moment, Deflection, Shear Force.

  1. Aldo giordano, giorgio pedrazzi and giovanni voiro, [balanced cantilever girder bridge over the danube-black sea channel], article no.4, romanian journal of transport infrastructure, vol.2, 2013, no.2.
  2. Boris azinović, david koren and vojko kilar, [seismic safety of the precast balcony cantilever elements for prevention of thermal bridges], ar 2014/2.
  3. Suhas s vokunnaya, ravindranatha and tanaji.thite, [construction stage analysis of segmental cantilever bridge], international journal of civil engineering and technology (ijciet), volume 8, issue 2, february 2017, pp. 373–382 article id: ijciet_08_02_040.
  4. Karthik .h. purohit and dr a.a bage, [construction stage analysis of cable stayed bridge by cantilever method of construction (nagpur cable stayed bridge)], international journal of innovative research in science, engineering and technology, vol. 6, issue 7, july 2017.
  5. Jn mahto and sc roy, [experimental analysis of propagation of crack in brass cantilever beam under forced vibration], international journal of mechanical engineering and technology (ijmet), volume 7, issue 5, september–october 2016, pp.316–320, article id: ijmet_07_05_030.
  6. R.anbarasi, s.aruljothy, r.balamurugan and r.renganathan, [segmental analysis and design of superstructure for box girder balanced cantilever bridge by irc specification using midas civil], international journal of intellectual advancements and research in engineering computations, issn:2348-2079, volume 7 issue 2. vol.–07(02) 2019 [3159-3167]
  7. Hamid aadal, pejman ghasemipoor sabet, ali bagheri fard and kiyanoosh golchin rad, [cast in-situ balanced cantilever for building a bridge], journal of basic and applied scientific research, 3(9)311-317, 2013.
  8. Jn mahto, sc roy, j kushwaha and rs prasad, [displacement analysis of cantilever beam using fem package], international journal of mechanical engineering and technology (ijmet), volume 4, issue 3, may - june (2013).
  9. Ardra m r, arya k s, athira m s, sreelakshmi m s and kichu paul, [study and analysis of balanced cantilever bridge at kochi metro], international research journal of engineering and technology (irjet), volume: 06 issue: 4 | apr 2019.
  10. Rubina p. patil and r. s. talikoti, [seismic analysis of balanced cantilever bridge considering time dependent properties], international journal of engineering research & technology (ijert), issn: 2278-0181, vol. 3 issue 7, july – 2014.
  11. N sobhana , a ramakrishnaiah and p somusekhar, [pushover analysis of balance cantilever bridge], international research journal of engineering and technology (irjet),  volume: 04 issue: 11 | nov -2017.
  12. Abhilash pokkilan and ramayanapu rajesh kumars, [studies on large span cantilever structures by using staad pro. analysis], international journal of engineering sciences & research technology, issn: 2277-9655, impact factor: 2.114, october, 2014.
  13. G.f. giaccu, d. solinas and g.p. gamberini, [time –dependent analysis of segmentally constructed cantilever bridge comparing two different creep model], ceb-fip model code, thomas telford services ltd., london, 2012.
  14. Lukáš krkoškaa, and martin moravčíka, [the analysis of thermal effect on concrete box girder bridge], xxiv r-s-p seminar, theoretical foundation of civil engineering (24rsp) (tfoce 2015).
  15. Asterios liolios, dimitrios konstantinidis, georgios konstantinidis and fani antoniou, [design of twin leaf balanced cantilever bridges in greece under seismic conditions], 2014. 
  16. Pandule ashok, bangar datta, shubham kadam, banduke satish and n.a. maske, [analysis and design of pre-stressed concrete box girder deck slab bridge], international research journal of engineering and technology (irjet), volume: 06 issue: 05 | may 2019.
  17. Anjani kumar shukla and p r maiti, [retrofitting and rehabilitation of damage footbridge over yamuna river], international journal of recent technology and engineering (ijrte),   issn: 2277-3878, volume-8 issue-2, july 2019.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 6 | Issue 2 | March-April 2022
Date of Publication : 2022-03-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 122-130
Manuscript Number : IJSRCE226210
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-6667

Cite This Article :

Manish Sahu, Murlidhar Chouraiya, "Analysis of Different Span Cantilever Bridge As Per IRC Loading Using Staad Beava : A Review", International Journal of Scientific Research in Civil Engineering (IJSRCE), ISSN : 2456-6667, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp.122-130, March-April.2022
URL : https://ijsrce.com/IJSRCE226210

Article Preview

Contact Us

  • Address : 3 & 4, Sterling Plaza, Indira Circle, 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot-360005, Gujarat, India