Manuscript Number : IJSRCE193616
Utilization of Management tool Microsoft Project in Construction Industry : A Review
Authors(2) :-Rahul Dubey, Rahul Satbhaiya
In a country like India, where population is growing rapidly with development of the nation, this is resulting in lack of space ultimately asking for tall structures in order to create space for every individual. Some parts of India are under seismic zone V, which needs utmost care and safety, thus there is a need of lateral load resisting members in a tall structure. In this study we are analyzing a G+12 tall structure, considering seismic zone V (response spectrum method) with soft soil condition, for analysis and modelling, ETABS'17 is used. Here we are considering infill masonry wall frame and steel bracing system frame for comparison. The steel bracing system and Infill masonry in reinforced concrete frames is viable for resisting lateral forces, steel bracing is easy to erect occupies less space and has flexibility in design for meeting the required strength and stiffness whereas Infill masonry is easy to assign with unskilled labors. In this comparative study, it is concluded that Steel bracing at exterior shows desirable stability than other cases in terms of resisting forces and moment. Also, in terms of cost effectiveness steel bracing system is quite suitable for lateral load resisting whereas Infill masonry structure is second alternate whereas bare frame case shows worst result. Therefore, it can be justifying that steel bracing frame is overall more stable than bare frame.
Rahul Dubey
P. G. Scholar Department of Civil Engineering, Infinity Management and Engineering College, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
Rahul Satbhaiya
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Infinity Management and Engineering College, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India
ETABS, Infill, Structural Analysis, Response Spectrum, Tall Structure, Bracings, Cost Analysis.
- Tanja Kalman Šipoš , Hugo Rodriguesb , Marin Grubiši?a. “Simple design of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames for earthquake resistance”. “ELSEVIER”. ISSN 0141-0296, 2018, pp 1-22.
- R. Soto, ch. H. Wu and a. M. Bubela. “development of infill drilling recovery models for carbonate reservoirs using neural networks and multivariate statistical as a novel method”. “Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro”. Vol. 1, ISSN 5, 1999, pp 5-23.
- Santiago Pujol, Amadeo Benavent-Climent, Mario E Rodriguez and J. Paul Smith-Pardo. “Masonry infill walls: an effective alternative for seismic strengthening of low-rise reinforced concrete building structures”. “14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering”. October 12-17, 2008.
- Sachin Surendran and Hemant B. Kaushik “Masonry Infill RC Frames with Openings: Review of In-plane Lateral Load Behaviour and Modeling Approaches”, “The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal”, ISSN 1874-8368, Vol 6, 2012, pp126-154.
- H. Ozkaynak , E. Yuksel, C. Yalcin , A. A. Dindar and O. Buyukozturk, “Masonry infill walls in reinforced concrete frames as a source of structural damping”, “EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, ISSN 949–968, 2013, pp949-968.
- Andrew Kauffman 1 and Ali M. Memari. “Performance Evaluation of Different Masonry Infill Walls with Structural Fuse Elements Based on In-Plane Cyclic Load Testing, mdpi, ISSN 2075-5309, vol 4, 2014, pp605-634.
- Prakash Paudel, “Effect of Infill Walls in Performance of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures,” International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science” ISSN 2091-2730, Vol. 5, Issue 4, 2017, pp24-27.
Publication Details
Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 6 | November-December 2019
Date of Publication : 2019-12-30
License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 107-113
Manuscript Number : IJSRCE193616
Publisher : Technoscience Academy
URL : https://ijsrce.com/IJSRCE193616
Article Preview