A Review of Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of R.C Framed Structure

Authors(3) :-Amit Kumar Soni, Prof. J. P. Gupta, Prof. Praveen Singh Tomar

Late tremors in India demonstrate that non-built as well as designed structures in our nation are powerless even to direct quakes. Indian Standard IS 1893 is overhauled in 2002. Various structures those were planned according to the past code may not conform to the present code. Along these lines assessing seismic execution of a structure and proposing reasonable retrofit measure is a significant zone of concentrate in this specific circumstance. In the present examination an endeavor has been made to assess a current structure situated in Bhopal (seismic zone V) utilizing proportional static investigation. Indian Standard IS-1893:2002 (Part-1) is pursued for the comparable static examination methodology. Building is displayed in business programming STAAD Pro. Seismic power interest for every individual part is determined for the plan base shear as required by Seems to be 1893:2002. Relating part limit is determined according to Indian Standard IS456:2000. Insufficient individuals are distinguished through interest to-limit proportion. Various shafts and segment components in the primary floor of the present structure are observed to be inadequate that needs retrofitting. A neighborhood retrofitting procedure is embraced to redesign the limit of the insufficient individuals. This investigation demonstrates that steel jacketing is a proficient method to retrofit RC individuals to improve flexure just as shear limit.

Authors and Affiliations

Amit Kumar Soni
M.Tech. Scholar, Patel Institute of Engineering and Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Prof. J. P. Gupta
Department of Civil Engineering, PIES, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Prof. Praveen Singh Tomar
H.O.D, Department of Civil Engineering, PIES, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

STAAD Pro., Seismic Force, Seismic Performance, Retrofit, Shear Capacity.

  1. http://help.solidworks.com/2012/English/SolidWorks/cworks/c_Definitions_Response_Spectra.htm.
  2. A. Meher Prasad: “Response Spectrum”, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Madras
  3. Bobby Motwani: “Are We Ready for El Centro”.
  4. Pankaj Agarwal, Manish Shrikhande: “Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures”, PHI Learning Private Limited, 2011.
  5. David T. Finley, Ricky A. Cribbs: “Equivalent Static vs Response Spectrum – A comparision of two methods”
  6. Durgesh C. Rai, “Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of Existing Buildings”, IITK-GSDMA –EQ24-V2.0
  7. http://www.microstran.com/faq_dynamics.htm#ResponseSpectrumAnalysis.
  8. Joao Luis Domingues Costa: “Standard Methods for Seismic Analyses”, Report BYG.DTU R-064, 2003

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 4 | July-August 2019
Date of Publication : 2019-08-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 48-53
Manuscript Number : IJSRCE19324
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-6667

Cite This Article :

Amit Kumar Soni, Prof. J. P. Gupta, Prof. Praveen Singh Tomar, "A Review of Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of R.C Framed Structure", International Journal of Scientific Research in Civil Engineering (IJSRCE), ISSN : 2456-6667, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp.48-53, July-August.2019
URL : https://ijsrce.com/IJSRCE19324

Article Preview

Contact Us

  • Address : 3 & 4, Sterling Plaza, Indira Circle, 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot-360005, Gujarat, India