Analysis of Different Shaped Footing Under Soft Soil Condition : A Review

Authors(2) :-Manawar Ali, Pratiksha Malviya

Soil Structure interaction is very important part of a building-load distribution. As the total load of a building is directly transmitted to the soil beneath footing. Shape of footing plays a vital role in distributing load to the soil, thus shape of footing should be ideal to distribute maximum load to the soil. Foundations provide support for structures, transferring their load to layers of soil or rock that have sufficient bearing capacity and suitable settlement characteristics. The term footing or footings is an ambiguous one that can be interpreted in a number of ways. In some cases ‘footings’ is used as a synonym for shallow foundations. Shallow foundations are typically used where the loads imposed by a structure are low relative to the bearing capacity of the surface soils. Here, the most commonly used term is strip footing (or footings), referring to a strip foundations, used to provide a continuous strip of support to a linear structure such as a wall. Approved Document A of building regulations defines minimum widths for strip footings based on the load of load-bearing walling they support. A brief review on footing flexibility and code provision of previous studies is presented here. This literature review focuses on sloping ground, lateral forces in reinforced concrete structures, soil data implementation in a building foundation and some code provisions will be addressed by area.

Authors and Affiliations

Manawar Ali
P.G. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Millennium Institute of Technology and Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Pratiksha Malviya
Assistant Professor & H.O.D., Department of Civil Engineering, Millennium Institute of Technology and Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Footing, Different Shape, Structural Analysis, Finite Element Analysis.

  1. Abhishek Sanjay Mahajan & Laxman G. Kalurkar, “performance analysis of rcc and steel concrete composite structure under seismic effect”, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Volume 5 Issue 4 Apr-2016.
  2. Anamika Tedia & Dr. Savita Maru, “Cost, Analysis and Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Structure RCC Structure”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Volume 11, Issue 1, Jan. 2014.
  3. Aniket Sijaria, Prof Anubhav Rai & Prof Y.K. Bajpai, “Cost comparison between r.c.c. beam& steel composite beam structure of g+5 storeyed building the overall plan dimension of the building is 56.3 m x 31.94m”, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6, June 2014.
  4. Bhavin H. Zaveri, Jasmin A. Gadhiya & Hitesh K. Dhameliya, “A Review on the Comparative Study of Steel, RCC and Composite Building”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Tech., Vol. 5, Issue 1, January 2016.
  5. Chen Qingjun. "Numerical simulation for soil domain in shaking table model test." (in Chinese) Quarterly Mechanics. 2002, 23(3):407-411.
  6. D. R. Panchal & P. M. Marathe, “comparative study of r.c.c, steel and composite (g+30 storey) building”, institute of technology, Nirma University, 08-10 December 2011.
  7. Deepak M Jirage, Prof . V.G. Sayagavi & Prof. N.G. Gore, “Comparative Study of RCC and Composite Multi-storeyed Building”, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science, Volume 1, Issue 6, September 2015.
  8. IS 11384:1985, “Code of Practice for Design of Composite Structure, Bureau of Indian Standards”, New Delhi
  9. IS 1893: 2016, “Code for earthquake resistant design of structures- general provisions for buildings, Part I, Bureau of Indian Standards”, New Delhi.
  10. IS 456: 2000, “Code for practice of plain and reinforced concrete code of practice, Bureau of Indian Standards”, New Delhi.
  11. Jeeva K, & Prof. G. Augustine Maniraj Pandian, “Study of Behavior of Steel and Steel-Concrete Composite Multi-storey Moment Resistant Frames Using Pushover Analysis”, International Conference on Engineering Trends and Science & Humanities page no. 17 to 21, 2015.
  12. Mahesh Suresh Kumawat & L G Kalurkar, “analysis and design of multistory building using composite structure”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 3, issue No. 2, May 2014.
  13. Mr. Nitish A. Mohite, Mr. P.K.Joshi & Dr. W. N. Deulkar, “Comparative Analysis of RCC and Steel-Concrete-Composite (B+G+ 11 Storey) Building”, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 10, October 2015.
  14. Nitin m. Warade & P. J. Salunke, “comparative study on analysis and design of composite structure”, International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering, Volume No.2, Issue No.12, December, 2013.
  15. Prasad Kolhe & Prof. Rakesh Shinde, “Time History Analysis Of Steel And Composite Frame Structure”, International Journal of Research in Engineering & Advanced Technology, Volume 3, Issue 2, April-May, 2015.
  16. Prof. S. S. Charantimath, Prof. Swapnil B.Cholekar & Manjunath M. Birje, “Comparative Study on Structural Parameter of R.C.C and Composite Building”, Civil and Environmental Research, Volume 6, Issue No.6, 2014.
  17. Sattainathan Sharma, R. Anjughap Priya, R. Thirugnanam and P. Rathna Priya, “Comparative Study on Multi-storey Structure of R.C.C and Composite Material”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 9, Issue 2, January 2016.
  18. Shweta A. Wagh & Dr. U. P. Waghe, “Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures”, Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp.369-376 April 2014.
  19. Umesh P. Patil & Suryanarayana M, “ analysis of g+15 rcc and composite structure having a soft storey at ground level by response spectrum and equivalent static methods using etabs 2013”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 3, June-2015.
  20. Vaishali Ambe & Dr. Savita Maru, “Life cycle cost analysis of Steel- Concrete Composite Structure”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2015.
  21. Varsha Patil & Shilpa Kewate, “Comparative Study on Dynamic Analysis of Composite, RCC & Steel Structure”, International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences Volume 3, Issue 8, August 2015.
  22. Wang Xucheng. "Principle and numerical method of finite element method." (in Chinese) Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1997.
  23. Wolf J.P. "soil-structure dynamic interaction." Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1985.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 2 | March-April 2019
Date of Publication : 2019-04-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 09-15
Manuscript Number : IJSRCE19322
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-6667

Cite This Article :

Manawar Ali, Pratiksha Malviya, "Analysis of Different Shaped Footing Under Soft Soil Condition : A Review ", International Journal of Scientific Research in Civil Engineering (IJSRCE), ISSN : 2456-6667, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp.09-15, March-April.2019
URL : https://ijsrce.com/IJSRCE19322

Article Preview

Contact Us

  • Address : 3 & 4, Sterling Plaza, Indira Circle, 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot-360005, Gujarat, India